Timeline for Are questions about editor-client-relations not on topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2017 at 22:37 | comment | added | timonsku Mod | I disagree, the question also asks what to do with the material and how to approach to recover from the work that was done. That definitely goes into specifics of video production and is not a generic contract law question. It is borderline yes but I wouldn't vote to close. | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 12:24 | comment | added | Dr Mayhem Mod | Hmmmm - if I was not a mod, I would have voted to close, as I see the question as nothing to do with video production, and everything to do with contract law and expectations. You could replace video with various other topics and the question would be the same, as would your answer, Moritz - which tells me it is not on topic here. | |
| Jan 23, 2017 at 17:24 | history | edited | timonskuMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 50 characters in body
|
| Jan 23, 2017 at 13:22 | comment | added | MoritzLost | Good to know there's some consensus on that stance. I've created the tag (tag guidance proposal still needs approval though). There's three close votes on the question I mentioned already though, curious to see where this is going ... | |
| Jan 23, 2017 at 13:20 | vote | accept | MoritzLost | ||
| Jan 22, 2017 at 22:00 | history | answered | timonskuMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |